West Brom decline appeal after two-point deduction for financial rule breach in 2026

West Brom accept a two-point deduction for breaching profit and sustainability rules in 2026 without appeal.

Points deduction details West Bromwich Albion received a two-point penalty for violating financial regulations after a two-day independent hearing last month. The sanction was confirmed just before the club's final home match against Ipswich Town. The decision meant the Baggies fell to six points above the relegation zone with two fixtures remaining, though they ultimately avoided the drop. Albion finished the 2025-26 Championship season in 21st place, four points clear of the bottom three. ## Financial breach specifics The English Football League disclosed the reasons for the penalty and the exact breach amount, which totaled just under £1.97 million. Championship clubs are permitted to lose up to £39 million over a three-year span after allowable adjustments. A breach of £2 million would have triggered a four-point deduction instead of the two-point penalty applied in this case. ## Club's objection to ruling West Brom strongly disagreed with the sanction but chose not to challenge it, calling the decision unfair. The dispute centered on so-called 'in-kind' payments totaling £2.1 million to their charity, The Albion Foundation, which the club argued should not be included in profit and sustainability calculations. The Club Financial Reporting Unit had previously excluded this amount before the EFL reversed the decision. The EFL stated that community development expenditure is allowed only if the expense is recorded in the club's official accounts. ## EFL's explanation of decision The EFL clarified that permitted adjustments in financial reports are meant to protect clubs spending on recognized charitable causes. The club financial review panel emphasized its role was to enforce financial rules, not evaluate the value of contributions to the community. The panel concluded that the adjustment was not permissible under existing regulations. The EFL maintained the decision was based strictly on compliance with financial guidelines. ## Club's response and future plans West Brom reiterated their view that the CFRU should not have changed its approach retroactively, calling the outcome 'grossly unfair.' Despite disagreeing with the ruling, the club decided an appeal would not provide practical benefits and chose to prioritize moving forward. Officials expressed gratitude to players, staff, and supporters for their resilience during the challenging period. The statement highlighted the unity shown as a positive reflection of the club's character and future direction.